The Brexit minister, Lord Frost, made the remarks in a speech on Tuesday following the government’s tough stance on the controversial issue. Block It would be a “historical misunderstanding” not to rewrite it. Dell
But the minister was accused of fanning the flames. European Union In an attempt to “disgrace” and overturn the referendum results, he set up his stall and demanded effectively. Northern Ireland Protocol He has signed
According to GuardianThe block will offer up to 50 per cent post-Brexit waiver on goods entering Northern Ireland from the UK, more than half on cold meats and plants.
European Commission Vice-President Marus Seifkov, who is expected to hold a press conference on Wednesday, has previously said that the measures would be “far-reaching” and that the movement of agricultural food and medicine in the Irish Sea But we will solve the problems.
An EU official also said that “Brussels will allow more goods to enter Northern Ireland without a check in exchange for having more data to monitor the market properly.” Telegraph.
“The number of checks will be greatly reduced. This is the best way to cut a check, less than a Swiss-style alignment agreement.
Although the measures could ease the day-to-day friction between the NI and the GB, the role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) remains a major point of contention when Lord Frost suggested that the court oversee the government. There is a red line.
Under the terms of the agreement. Boris Johnson Appreciated by the ministers in 2019 and later, the ECJ will be the final arbiter in any trade dispute between the two sides over the operation of the protocol.
The British government now wants to remove the post and replace it with an independent arbitration process, but Mr Sefkovich has insisted the EU will not move forward.
Conservative Party Chairman Oliver Duden said the reported suggestions would be enough. Sky News: We will wait for the full announcement from the European Union.
“Overall, the government will be fully, constructively engaged with these proposals. It is important that there be a fundamental change in the Northern Ireland Protocol – let’s see what the EU brings.
He added that there were “broad questions about eligibility” for the European Court of Justice, adding: “This agreement is governed by one-sided courts rather than individually.”
However, he declined to say whether changing this part of the agreement would be a “deal breaker”, adding: “This is a big issue for us – I will not start amputing in advance, here. And I’m writing red lines there. ”