The video of the former cabinet minister – speaking on the sidelines of the Tory party’s annual conference last week – was uploaded by the Civil Liberties Campaign Group. See big brother.
In a notification email, the platform told the organization: “YouTube does not allow claims about the Covid 19 vaccine that conflict with the consensus of local health officials or World Health Organization (WHO) experts.”
During the speech, Mr Davis criticized the use of home vaccine passports, calling them “neutral” and demanding that we, the average British citizen, prepare our papers to do something that is normal in our daily lives. Is.
The Conservative MP suggested that the use of vaccine passports was “an attempt to advance the policy by covert coercion, to put pressure on people to get vaccinated”.
Just last month, the UK government dramatically blocked proposals to make vaccine passports mandatory in crowded places such as nightclubs, but reserved the policy option.
Angered at the move to remove the video, which has now been reinstated on YouTube, Mr Davis called it a “provocative attack on freedom of expression”.
“Throughout the epidemic, we have seen clear efforts by major technology to silence the voices of the opposition challenging traditional wisdom,” he said.
Mr Davis added: “My speech at the conference was carefully studied, backed by the most accurate and up-to-date scientific facts.
“This vague attempt to censor YouTube’s speech is a warning. If YouTube is happy to try to silence elected members of parliament, it is also happy to censor those who upload content to their speeches.” Are
Senior Conservatives have urged the government to reconsider the late Online Safety Bill, which they described as “completely inadequate proposals” that are giving more power to “countless Silicon Valley giants.” Are
Mark Johnson, Big Brother Watch’s legal and policy officer, said removing his speech was a serious act of censorship from a platform with a growing record of pressuring free speech.
“Anyone can censor YouTube if a Member of Parliament and a human rights group. Although YouTube has now restored our video, it is clear that free speech online is in jeopardy. Although we have the means to fight back. Yes, not everyone does. ”
Google, which owns YouTube, has been contacted for comment. Free