Facebook has banned thousands of individuals and organizations allegedly involved in terrorism. Tuesday’s report by Intercept., As part of a dangerous blacklist called so-called dangerous individuals and organizations (DIOs) that appear to mirror the interests of the US government and military.
Facebook list, a Whose snapshot Allegedly published by the site. There are more than 4,000 individuals and organizations involved in hate, crime, terrorism, militant social movements and violent non-state actors. Users who discuss these individuals or groups may be penalized by social network moderators. According to For three tier systems Facebook announced in June that it would determine the conditions under which DIOs could be discussed on the site.
For example, Tier 1 includes people who cause “serious offline harm”, such as organizing violence against citizens, advocating harm based on safe havens, or engaging in organized crime. Facebook has removed the “definition, solid support and representation” of Tier 1 groups and statistics, as well as “violations of violent incidents” that may be committed by them. This category includes terrorists.
Tier 2 includes armed rebels in the Syrian civil war, such as “violent non-state actors”, for which Facebook will allow a limited definition of non-violent acts but “all basic support and representation” or “violent activities of these groups.” Will remove any definition of “. “Tier 3 is the least severe and has the least restrictions. These include organizations that Facebook intends to violate its policies on hate speech and dangerous organizations, or demonstrate intent to “offline violence” on a projected timeline, but Those who “have not necessarily been involved in violence to date or have advocated violence against others. Based on their safe havens. No individual or group is banned at any level.”
Intercept obtained a full list of DIOs and found that 70% of Tier 1 was related to terrorism and “consists of a large number of Middle Eastern and South Asian organizations and individuals.” Other people in this category include criminal organizations such as street gangs and drug cartels that are “primarily black and Latin,” the site wrote.
Tier 1 also includes 500 hate groups, including more than 250 white supremacist groups, but Intercept reports that many other “mainly white right-wing militia groups resembling hate groups.” Has been placed in 3 levels. About 1,000 of them are a thousand. This section provides an overview of the company’s militia problem scale. Claimed to be cracked down. Starting August 2020.
All told, the list published by Intercept is rated as 53.7 terrorism, 23.3. Military social movements, 17% hate groups, 4.9% criminals, and a small 1% non-state elements. As Virge noted.When Facebook nominates a DIO, there may be one. Important and extensive Possibly thousands of groups and pages have been removed.
The DIO’s list seems to take a lot of clues from the State Department’s list of officially approved terrorist groups, a list that includes a large list of individuals and organizations that are sometimes linked to foreign terrorists. There is only a solid connection with terrorism, but they are largely devoid of white supremacists.
This explains Facebook’s fixation on some groups and the relatively light contact on others, which Intercept has noted could stem the debate on the site, saying it is “really dangerous.” Or else, the US government should be sick. Advised to fight against them). The list also includes insights into why two anarchist publications, Crimethinc and it’s going down, Were banned – they are both categorized into the category of military social movement and the sub-category of “armed militia”. Both groups have denied the allegations in a statement issued Friday stating “Similar, baseless allegations concerning Russia’s intelligence have been made more than once.
“When a major, global platform chooses to align its policies with the United States – a country that has long dominated much of the world (and in particular, over the last twenty years, many Muslim countries.) Dominance has been established, it is only regenerating, ”said Jillian York, director of international freedom of expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. have been.
On several occasions, Facebook has an allegedly independent monitoring board. Recommendations issued Such as publishing the DIO list in its entirety for transparency purposes and coming up with clear rules. Of Facebook Brian Fishman, policy director for counterterrorism and dangerous organizations, told Intercept that the list was not partially published to prevent groups from finding fault.
Fishman told the site, “This is a hostile place, so we try to be as transparent as possible while prioritizing security, limiting legal risks and preventing groups from having opportunities to go around their rules.” Are. “
“We don’t want terrorists, hate groups, Or criminal organizations on our platforms, which is why we ban them and remove content that compliments, represents, Or support them, “he added.” A team of more than 350 experts on Facebook is focused on stopping these organizations and assessing emerging threats. “