Critics of Mayor Adams’ plan to place asylum seekers in refugee-style tents found it “illegal” and “inhuman” on Friday, as questions continued to arise about how exactly – and whether – his administration intended to uphold the law state to shelter.

“This pitch has been sold as a state-of-the-art facility with food, beds and a warm New York welcome,” said Councilor Shahana Hanif D-Brooklyn, chairwoman of the Council’s Immigration Committee at a city hall rally. . “But there’s nothing modern about a refugee camp built outside in the flood zone in October.”

The criticism of Hanif came just hours before the Council’s hearing on Adams’ policy and a week after he and top city officials announced their latest plan to tackle the migrant influx into the city by building five tents in the Orchard Beach parking lot in the Bronx. The unfinished plan almost immediately raised doubts that it was being implemented to avoid the state’s right to refuge, which obliges local governments to provide housing to those seeking it, within a prohibited timeframe.

The city has clearly broken the law dozens of times since Adams took office in January.

Hanif and other critics cursed Friday against the mayor’s policy on a laundry list: the administration had not consulted local elected officials before announcing it last week, the location is remote and prone to flooding, and questions remain as to exactly how the tents will be used for assistance to asylum seekers.

Employees established New York City's first Center for Humanitarian and Emergency Relief in an Orchard Beach parking lot on Tuesday, September 27, 2022, in the Bronx, New York.

Hanif also bristled to discover that a tent contractor at SLSCO, based in Orchard Beach, Texas, had helped build the south boundary wall of former President Donald Trump. She called Adams Orchard Beach’s overall scheme “illegal.”

Asylum seekers from South and Central America have been pouring into the city for months, many on buses directed here by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who has tried to use the buses as a way to criticize President Biden’s border policy. So far, the Adams administration estimates that more than 13,000 migrants have flocked to the Big Apple, putting additional strain on the city’s already burdened shelter system.

The tents at Orchard Beach are designed to ease this crisis, but critics see it as the wrong answer.

Catalina Cruz from the Queens team wondered why migrants have to be put in tents when there are other alternatives. She suggested that the city could provide shelter in the Javits Center, student dormitories and vacant hotels.

“I urge our state and our city administration to work together in finding options as they have to be,” she said. “We have money for all of this. We are a very rich city. Every time someone says we don’t have money, we find money. “

Catalina Cruz from New York (D-Queens)

Migrants continue to be housed in the city’s homeless shelters, and those shelters and tents expected in the Bronx are not the only options the city is currently working on.

Adams’s team is still negotiating potential agreements to accommodate migrants on cruise ships. A source familiar with the situation told Daily News on Wednesday that the city is in talks with Norwegian shipowners Carnival and Genting, but is closest to making a deal with Norway.

However, where to keep migrants is not the only outstanding question. For groups such as the Legal Aid Association and the Homeless Coalition – which are authorized to act as guard dogs when it comes to the right to shelter – the issue also remains a key point of contention.

When asked if the recent rhetoric of Adams and his team – they used the words “unprecedented” and “humanitarian” to describe the crisis – had any legal significance, Judith Goldiner of Legal Aid said they appeared to be trying to use language used for natural disasters .

“We asked them to point out to us any legal points they are trying to bring up here and what rules apply, and they have not yet done so,” she said.

However, some responses appeared at the hearing in the Council on Friday.

In response to questions from Hanif, Adams’ crisis management commissioner Zach Iscol said migrants who would live in tents would be provided lockers to keep their belongings safe, that there would be one shower for 15 residents and one toilet for 16 people.

Hanif also asked Iscol if administrative migrant tent camps had to abide by the rules of the right to refuge. He replied no, because the tents were not operated by the Department of Homeless Services and therefore did not fall within the scope of the Callahan v Carey ruling of 1979, which established the right to refuge in the city.

“These are not homeless shelters,” Iscol said of the tents. They are not subject to Callahan.

Mayor Adams answered questions about his Orchard Beach plan on Friday.

When asked how his administration was to ensure migrants that placement in tents was “voluntary” and that they had the option of using the shelter system instead, he suggested that “transparency” would be a priority.

“We intend to give some level of clarity and allow asylum seekers and migrants to know exactly what is available in the city,” he promised.

But he also suggested that he would compare the migration crisis with his priority: New Yorkers.

“My ultimate responsibility is to the New Yorkers, this is my final responsibility: to the people of this city,” he said. “No other borough is doing what New York is doing … We’ve gone above and beyond to make sure we treat people humanely and try to be as humane as possible.”

#York #City #Council #questions #safety #migrant #camp #Bronx

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *